Ride-hailing firms Uber and Lyft stated Friday they are going to cowl the authorized charges of any driver who’s sued below the brand new legislation prohibiting most abortions in Texas.
The Texas legislation bans abortions as soon as medical professionals can detect cardiac exercise, often round six weeks and infrequently earlier than ladies know they’re pregnant. Rather than be enforced by authorities authorities, the legislation provides residents the best to file civil fits and gather damages in opposition to anybody aiding an abortion — together with those that transport ladies to clinics.
San Francisco-based Lyft stated it has created a fund to cowl 100 per cent of the authorized charges for drivers sued below the legislation whereas driving on its platform. Calling the Texas legislation “an attack on women’s right to choose,” Lyft additionally stated it could donate $1 million to Planned Parenthood.
“We want to be clear: Drivers are never responsible for monitoring where their riders go or why. Imagine being a driver and not knowing if you are breaking the law by giving someone a ride,” Lyft stated in an announcement.
“Similarly, riders never have to justify, or even share, where they are going and why. Imagine being a pregnant woman trying to get to a health-care appointment and not knowing if your driver will cancel on you for fear of breaking a law.”
Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi responded to Lyft’s assertion in a tweet saying an identical coverage for its drivers.
“Drivers shouldn’t be put at risk for getting people where they want to go,” Khosrowshahi wrote. Uber can also be headquartered in San Francisco.
Right on <a href=”https://twitter.com/logangreen?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@logangreen</a> – drivers shouldn’t be put in danger for getting folks the place they need to go. Team <a href=”https://twitter.com/Uber?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@Uber</a> is in too and can cowl authorized charges in the identical method. Thanks for the push. <a href=”https://t.co/85LhOUctSc”>https://t.co/85LhOUctSc</a>
The ban leaves enforcement as much as particular person residents, enabling them to sue anybody who supplies or “aids or abets” an abortion after six weeks. This probably consists of drivers who unknowingly take ladies to clinics for abortion procedures.
Earlier this week, the chief government of Tinder-owner Match Group stated she is organising a fund to assist any Texas-based workers who want to hunt an abortion exterior the state.
Rival relationship app Bumble additionally criticized the legislation and introduced on Instagram it can donate funds to 6 organizations that assist ladies’s reproductive rights.
Both relationship firms are primarily based in Texas and led by ladies.
Match Group stated CEO Shar Dubey is creating the fund on her personal and never by way of the corporate. She spoke out in opposition to the legislation in a memo to workers on Thursday.
“I immigrated to America from India over 25 years ago and I have to say, as a Texas resident, I am shocked that I now live in a state where women’s reproductive laws are more regressive than most of the world, including India,” Dubey stated within the memo.
The Texas legislation, which took impact early Wednesday after the U.S. Supreme Court denied an emergency attraction from abortion suppliers, constitutes the largest curb to the constitutional proper to an abortion in a long time. It doesn’t make exceptions for rape or incest.
Website internet hosting service GoDaddy Inc. on Friday, in the meantime, shut down a Texas anti-abortion web site that allowed folks to report suspected abortions.